| Format | Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Article: Print | $US10.00 | |
| Article: Electronic | $US5.00 |
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SET) are routinely used to evaluate instructors. University administrators frequently use evaluations in a summative or evaluative way as input into decisions regarding salary, promotion, and retention. Simultaneously, administrators use evaluations to provide faculty formative or developmental feedback focused on improving teaching skills. Frequently, due to history or resource constraints, a single SET form is used to evaluate both online and classroom instructors. Given the growth of online courses in higher education, several questions emerge. What are the current practices employed in SET programs? Can the same SET form be used in both online and classroom environments? Can the SET form used for summative purposes also be used provide formative feedback directed at behavior change? Does the content of formative feedback differ between online and classroom courses?
These questions are addressed utilizing a survey of provosts from 92 universities regarding their use of SET ratings and the analysis of a SET database encompassing over 11,000 evaluations collected in an ongoing evaluation process using a single SET form in a southwestern university’s MBA program. This study focuses on course evaluations where the same instructor taught the same course in both an online and classroom environment in the same term.
| Keywords: | Student Evaluation of Teaching, Online Course Evaluation, Classroom Course Evaluation, Summative Feedback, Formative Feedback |
|---|
Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp.171-182. Article: Print (Spiral Bound). Article: Electronic (PDF File; 1.855MB).
Associate Professor, College of Business, University of Dallas, Irving, TX, USA
Associate Professor, College of Business, University of Dallas, Irving, TX, USA