| Format | Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Article: Print | $US10.00 | |
| Article: Electronic | $US5.00 |
As literature instructors face classrooms full of digital natives (Prensky 2001), we must interrogate the methods used to teach traditional literary analysis and evaluate whether they may be enhanced or even supplanted by using digital technologies to supplement traditional print-based assignments. Our collaborative paper details an experiment in an upper-division literature class to analyze and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the traditional literature class assignment to “explicate the meaning of a poem” by having students create parallel versions—one a traditional, print-based essay and the other a multimedia presentation using Microsoft PhotoStory 3. In this paper, the instructor (Koster) will delineate the purpose and requirement of the assignment; a majority of the students completing the assignment (Blumenschine, Folden, Hill, Mahan, Sigmon, Smith, Stone, Wasson) will contribute their analyses of composing in these different modalities; and Koster will draw preliminary conclusions based on the class’s overall results in completing the assignment. We argue that while the traditional print-based text allows closer attention to literary language and form, multi-media texts allow students to examine the nuances of tone, diction, and imagery in richer and more imaginative ways by choosing visual and auditory reinforcement of their interpretative scripts. In addition, we argue that the addition of the students’ own voices (as narrators) allows them to develop and portray an authorial ethos in ways the traditional “student writing to teacher” print essay does not. Thus, while both forms of the assignment have great value for students of literature, the multimodal text allows more opportunities to demonstrate synthetic skills and to facilitate deep learning (Marton & Saljo 1976). We recommend that students in literary analysis classes be given the opportunity to explore the possibilities both kinds of assignments offer for learning. Materials from the assignment, including samples of student print and digital work, will be available for review at http://faculty.winthrop.edu/kosterj/scholarly/ubiquitous.htm.
| Keywords: | Cybertext, Literature, Analysis, Pedagogy, Digital Natives, Deep Learning, Ethos, Multi-Media |
|---|
Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp.1-6. Article: Print (Spiral Bound). Article: Electronic (PDF File; 1.540MB).
Associate Professor of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of Political Science, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of English, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA
Department of Mass Communication, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, SC, USA